If material is available in plant B, then a stock transfer order from plant B to A is created automatically. Location substitution allows to check the material availability at plant B (as set in master data or business rule) if the material is not available at sales order plant A. Rule based ATP (For substitution of location (plant) or material), Multi-level ATP check, advanced check for product allocation with ATP, advanced BOP (Back order processing) etc are some of the unique features of GATP w.r.t ATP in ECC.
Not sure whether all functionalities of GATP will be integrated in S4 core. SAP also has plans to integrate APO’s GATP (Global ATP) functionality in S4 core.
SAP ECC WIKI UPDATE
SAP ECC WIKI MANUAL
Traditional FI-AR-CR credit control setting requires high degree of manual work. FSCM-CR is based on a distributed architecture which allows interfaces with external credit rating agencies. Refer note 2267140 for more details.ĮCC’s FI-AR-CR is replaced by credit management of FSCM (Financial supply chain management). Impact of this extension on custom coding, interfaces, other SAP applications need to be evaluated before switching on 40 characters. Refer URL for more details.Įxtension of Material number field : Material number can now be 40 characters from existing 18. Customer-vendor integration (CVI) is a mandatory step. Probably, SAP is trying to align the concept of business partner as in other SCM applications like APO, EWM, TM etc as these SCM applications also will be natively integrated with core of S4H in future releases.
SAP ECC WIKI CODE
Read operations in custom code will be redirected to compatibility views (like V_COEP for CO line item table COEP) via a special setting at database interface level (i.e invisible to source code) so that the custom reports can work without any disruption.Īll customer and vendor master need to integrated / migrated as Business partner. Īccount based CO-PA is now the default option with Costing based CO-PA as optional. However, new GL’s functionality (Parallel ledger) is a pre-requisite for new Asset accounting. Customers using classic GL need not use Document split or parallel ledger. S4H is technically very similar to new GL of ECC due to its data structure. Reconcilation (as in case of CO to FI) is not needed now. Cost elements (both primary and secondary) are now GL accounts and hence created / maintained (in FS00) with relevant Cost element category.
In S4H, only one field of universal journal is used to store both GL account and cost element. In ECC, FI GL accounts are mapped to CO primary cost elements. Material documents will be stored in MATDOC but not in MKPF or MSEG tables. MATDOC is also a new line item table for inventory management and it eliminates 26+ tables. Now, data needs to be inserted only a single table instead of several tables thus reducing the data foot print drastically. It eliminates several aggregate and index tables. S4H combines the data structures of different components (for FI, AA, CO, CO-PA and ML) into a single line item table ACDOCA, called as Universal journal.
Aggregates are created dynamically based on line item table instantaneously (on the fly).
SAP ECC WIKI FULL
Trying to highlight the major(not a full list) differences in digital core of S4H as planned by SAP w.r.t ECC Most of us are following the innovations & simplifications in S/4 HANA and wondering about the functionalities & business benefits of implementing S/4 HANA (S4H).Find lot of questions on differences in ECC with S/4 HANA (S4H).
0 kommentar(er)
